Sign In
Register
eISSN:2278-5299

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology

DOI:10.29111/ijlrst   ISRA Impact Factor:3.35,  Peer-reviewed, Open-access Journal

A News Letter Sign UP!
TURKISH OLYMPIC SPORT BRANCH COACHES? PERSONALITY TRAITS BASED \ON THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL

Research Paper Open Access

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology Vol.5 Issue 1, pp 16-23,Year 2016

TURKISH OLYMPIC SPORT BRANCH COACHES? PERSONALITY TRAITS BASED \ON THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL

Erdal Demir

Correspondence should be addressed to :

Received : 24 January 2016; Accepted : 04 February 2016 ; Published : 29 February 2016

Share
Download 125
View 177
Article No. 10604
Abstract

The purpose of the current research is to evaluate the personality profiles of Olympic sports coaches in Turkey within the framework of the Five-Factor Personality Model, and to investigate differences based on gender, national team coaching and coaching grade. A cross-sectional survey method is used as a research design. A stratified sampling procedure was applied, and coaches (nfemale=178; nmale=609) from 23 Olympic sports branches in 10 cities in Turkey voluntarily participated. The mean age of participants was 34.78+8.84. The data collection instruments were the PERI (Personality Inventory), which was used to assess the personality traits of participants; demographic variables were also gathered. The results of the research indicated that Olympic sports branch coaches have the emotional balance personality trait at “not effective or low” levels, the extraversion and openness to experience personality traits at “partially effective or circumstantial” levels and the compatibility and sense of responsibility personality traits at “effective or high” levels. There was no significant difference found between coaching grade and personality traits. Differences in personality traits in terms of coaching duties on the national team were found for compatibility and sense of responsibility, in favor of national team coaches.

Key Words   
Coach; Personality; National Team Coaching, Coaching Grade,
Copyright
References
  1. Gulgun Yanbastı, Theories of personality, Ege University Education Faculty Publications, Izmir, 1996.
  2. Orhan Dogan, “Sport Psychology,” Nobel Publications, Adana, 2005.
  3. Randy J. Larsen, David M. Buss, “Personality psychology: domains of knowledge about human natüre,” McGraw-Hill Book Company, Boston, 2008.
  4. Simon Taggar, Rick Hackett, Sudhir Saha, “Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 899–926, 1999.
  5. Murray R. Barrick, Michael K. Mount, “The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 1–26, 1991.
  6. Lilly M. Berry, “Psychology at work: An introduction to organizational psychology,” McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1998.
  7. Andrew J. DuBrin, “Applying psychology: Individual and organizational effectiveness,” Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2004.
  8. Howard S. Friedman, Mirian W. Schustack, “Personality: Classic theories and modern research,” Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 2003.
  9. Richard L. Hughes, “Leadership, enhancing the lessons of experience,” Donneley and Sons Company, New York, 1996.
  10. Zeynep Gokce Onag, Pınar Guzel, Selhan Ozbey, “The factors that affect team success to the view of the soccer coaches: The qualıtative research,” Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 4 (2), 125–145, 2013.
  11. Yasar Sevim, Fehmi Tuncer, Emre Erol and Hakan Sunay, Coach education and principles. Gazi Publications, Ankara, 2001.
  12. Sevki Koc, “Inside Sport Psychology,” Saray Publications, Izmir, Turkey, 1994.
  13. Ahmet Gun, “The analysis of opinions of coaching candidates, registered at TFF coaching courses in Turkey, regarding facilities, equipment used, administrative staff and educators,” Master’s thesis. Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, 2014.
  14. Douglas A. Raynor, Heidi Levine, “Associations between the Five-Factor Model of personality and behaviors among college students,” Journal of American College Health, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 73–81, 2009.
  15. Taylor Hugh, “Personality and achievement of athletic and non-athletic high school girls,” University of Victoria, May 1973. ERIC No: ED114726.
  16. Kyle J. Miller, Christopher Mesagno, “Personality traits and exercise dependence: Exploring the role of narcissism and perfectionism,” International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 4 pp. 368–381, Jun 2014, Doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2014.932821
  17. Sean Egan, Robert M. Stelmack, “A personality profile of Mount Everest climbers,” Personality and Individual Difference, 21, pp. 223–229, June 2003, Doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00130-7
  18. Bruce D. Kirkcaldy, “Personality profiles at various levels of athletic participation,” Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 3, pp. 321–326, 1982.
  19. Noemi Gyomber, Agota Learnt, Krisztina Kovacs, “Differences between personality characteristics and sport performance by age and gender,” Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae, Vol. I, No. III/II, pp. 5–15, 2013.
  20. Ceren Tokdemir, “Psychological factors and personality traits influencing sports performance: Opinions of successful national players of Turkish soccer history,” PhD thesis. Marmara Universitty, İstanbul, 2011.
  21. Bruce D. Kirkcaldy, “Personality and sex differences related to positions in team sports,” International Journal of Sport Psychology, Vol. 13,  3, pp. 141–153, 1982.
  22. Mustafa Yildiz, “Investigation of personality types and traits, and expression of anger among soccer players in amateur and youth soccer leagues,” Journal of Ataturk University Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 15–27, 2009.
  23. Unsal Tazegul, “The relationship between the types of personalities of male wrestlers and their ways of coping with stres,” Master’s thesis. Dumlupınar University, Kütahya, 2012.
  24. Arkun Tatar, “Comparison of personality profiles of female and male athletes by five factor personality model,” Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 70–79, 2009.
  25. Fırat Cetinoz, “Personal factor analysis of those doing individual and team sports,” Master’s thesis. Celal Bayar University, Manisa, 2005.
  26. Erdal Demir, “Evaluation of personality traits of physical education teachers working in secondary schools and high schools in Çanakkale according to their sports branch,” US-China Education Review B, Vol. 5, No. 1,pp. 27–34, 2015. doi: 10.17265/2161-6248/2015.01.003
  27. Çigdem Korkut, “The personality traits of Karate trainers are examined,” Master’s thesis. Marmara University, Istanbul, 2013.
  28. Erdal Demir, “Evaluation of personality traits of physical education teachers,” Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, Deutschland/Germany, 2014.
  29. Mark S. Allen, Lain Greenlees, Marc Jones, “An investigation of the five-factor model of personality and coping behaviour in sport,” Journal of Sport Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 24 pp. 841–850, May 2011.
  30. Niyazi Karasar, “Scientific research technigues,” Nobel Publications, Ankara, Turkey, 2011.
  31. Levent Sevinç, “Technical booklet of PERI personality enventory,” Assesment Systems Publications, Istanbul, 2005.
  32. Ayse Turksoy, Suleyman Sahin, Evren E. Altıncı and Ozgur Ozgul, “Analysis of the sources of stress of coaches and managers working in football clubs by their personality characteristics. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 77–90, 2012.
  33. Guido M. Cavallera, Andrea Passerini, Alessandro Pepe, “Personality traits and the role of gender in swimmers at the leisure level,” Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 693–704, Mayıs 2013.
  34. James H. Stronge, Thomas J. Ward, Pamela D. Tucker and Jennifer L. Hindman, “What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study,” J Pers Eval Educ, Vol. 20, pp. 165–184, February 2007. Doı:10.1007/s11092-008-9053-z
  35. Kasum Goran, Ljubisa Lazarevic, Sasa Jakovljevic, Ljubica Bacanac, and Fadilj Eminovic, “Personality characteristics of Serbian male wheelchair and professional basketball players,” Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Gymnica,Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 41–47, May 2012.
  36. Mustafa Yildiz, Murat Tekin, Sefa Lok, “Analysing the personality types of soccer players in different statuses,” Journal of Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute, Vol. 22, 437–443, 2009.
  37. Emin Kuru, Gulsum Bastug, “Research on male and female footballers’ self-perception of their characteristics and bodies,” SPORMETRE Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 95–101, March 2008. Doi: 10.1501/Sporm_0000000094
  38. Zoran Culjak, Boris Mlacic, “The Big-Five Model of personality and the success of high school students in physical education,” Croatian Journal of Education, Vol. 16, 2, pp. 471–490, January 2014.
  39. Hana Valkova, Mıroslaw Gorny, “Personality of physical education teachers and adapted physical activity,” TRENDS in Sport Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 20, pp. 107–114, 2013.
  40. Hakkı Ulucan, Ziya Bahadır, “The examination of weight lifters’ personal traits according to the some variables,” Nigde University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 175–183, 2011.
  41. Osman S. Coskunturk, “Personality traits of self-confidence, determination, the effect on the performance development of the impulse success. Master’s thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, 1988.
  42. Mark S. Allen, Lain Greenlees, Marc Jones, “Personality in sport: a comprehensive review,” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol. 6, pp. 184–208, March 2013.
To cite this article

Erdal Demir , " Turkish Olympic Sport Branch Coaches? Personality Traits Based \on The Five-factor Model ", International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology . Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp 16-23 , 2016

Responsive image

MNK Publication was founded in 2012 to upholder revolutionary ideas that would advance the research and practice of business and management. Today, we comply with to advance fresh thinking in latest scientific fields where we think we can make a real difference and growth now also including medical and social care, education,management and engineering.

Responsive image

We offers several opportunities for partnership and tie-up with individual, corporate and organizational level. We are working on the open access platform. Editors, authors, readers, librarians and conference organizer can work together. We are giving open opportunities to all. Our team is always willing to work and collaborate to promote open access publication.

Responsive image

Our Journals provide one of the strongest International open access platform for research communities. Our conference proceeding services provide conference organizers a privileged platform for publishing extended conference papers as journal publications. It is deliberated to disseminate scientific research and to establish long term International collaborations and partnerships with academic communities and conference organizers.