eISSN:2278-5299

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology

DOI:10.29111/ijlrst   ISRA Impact Factor:3.35,  Peer-reviewed, Open-access Journal

A News Letter Sign UP!
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION PARAMETERS OF FOUR SPECIES IN THE BULGARIAN BLACK SEA COAST

Research Paper Open Access

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology Vol.3 Issue 5, pp 46-52,Year 2014

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION PARAMETERS OF FOUR SPECIES IN THE BULGARIAN BLACK SEA COAST

Maria YANKOVA

Correspondence should be addressed to :

Received : 31 October 2014; Accepted : 31 October 2014 ; Published : 31 October 2014

Share
Download 125
View 184
Article No. 10392
Abstract

Sex ratio, morphometric characteristics, age and growth for four fish species from Bulgarian Black Sea were examined. A total of 2013 individuals from 4 families, were caught between May 2006 and December 2010. Female: male sex ratio varied from 1:0.3 in Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus to 1:1.9 in Sarda sarda. According to the age readings, distribution varied from I to VI year. The von Bertalanffy equation and growth performance index were determined by FiSAT II software in Alosa imaculata, Engraulis encrasicolus, Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus and Sarda sarda. Asymptotic values for total length (L∞) ranged from 82.97 cm for S. sarda to 14.60 cm for E. encrasicolus. Growth rates (k) varied from 0.4794 year−1 for E. encrasicolus to 0.1044 year−1 for T. mediterraneus. The data sets were limited in most cases, thus this study provides preliminary population parameters only, but for species for which information is scarce.

Key Words   
Age, growth, morphometric characteristics, sex ratio
Copyright
References
  1. Ateş, C., Deval, C.M., Bök, T. 2008. Age and growth of Atlantic bonito (Sarda sarda Bloch, 1793) in the Sea of Marmara and Black Sea, Turkey. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 24: 546–550.
  2. Avşar, D., Çelik M., Çiçek, E. 1999. Comparision of the food compounds of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus Linnaeus, 1758) from North-eastern mediterranean and the eastern Black Sae. Ege Uni. Fac of Fis., J. of Fis. and Aqua. Sci., 16(3-4): 327-334 (in Turkish).
  3. Bellido, J.M., Pierce, G.J., Romero, J.L., Millan, M. 2000. Use of frequency analysis methods estimate growth of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus1758) in the Gulf of Cadis (SW Spain). Fisheries Research, 48: 107-115.
  4. Bingel, F., Gücü, A.C., Nierman, U., Kıdeyş, A.E., Mutlu, E., Doğan, M., Kayıkçı., Y., Avşar, D., Bekiroğlu, Y., Genç, Y., Okur H., Zengin M. 1996. Stock Assesment Studies of the Black Sea Coast, Tubitak, Final Report, 172.
  5. Budakov, Lj., Pujin, V., Maletin, S., Mučenski, V. Prilog poznavanju ihtiofaune  Koviljskog rita. [Contribution to knowledge of Kovilj wetland ichthyofauna.] Biosistematika, 9: 51-59. (in Serbian).
  6. Cihangir, B., Uslu, B. 1992. A preliminary study on fecundity of anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus (Linneaus, 1758) from Aegean Sea, Tr. J. Zool., 16: 301-310.
  7. Ciolac, A., Patriche, N. 2004. Structure of danube shad (Alosa pontica Eichwald, 1838) spawner flocks migrating for reproduction in Danube River. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2(2): 53–58.
  8. Cengiz, Ö. 2013. Some biological characteristics of Atlantic bonito (Sarda sarda Bloch, 1793) from Gallipoli Peninsula and Dardanelles (northeastern Mediterranean, Turkey). Turk J Zool 37: 73–83.
  9. Düzgüneş, E., Karaçam, H. 1989. Studies on some population parameters and growth of the European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus, Linneaus, 1758) in the Blak Sea. Tr. J. Zool., 13: 77-83.
  10. Düzgüneş, E., Karaçam, H., 1989. Investigation on some population parameters and growth characteristics of anhovy (Engraulis encrasicolus, 1758) in the Black Sea. Doğa Zooloji, (13): 7-83.
  11. Demir, M. 1963. Synopsis of biological data on bonito Sarda sarda (Bloch) 1793. FAO Fish. Rep. 6(2):101-129
  12. Erkoyuncu, Ü., Özdamar, E. 1989. Estimation of the age, size and sex composition and growth parameters of Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus (L) in the Black Sea. Fisher. Res., 7: 241-247.
  13. Ergüden, D., Turan C. Çevik, C. 2007. The growth features of Pontic Shad Alosa pontica (Eichwald, 1838) in the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Biol. Sc., 7 (4): 685–688.
  14. Gordina, A.D., Nikolsky., V.N. Niermann., U., Bingel, F., Subbotin, A.A. 1997. New data on the morphological differences of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in the Black Sea. Fisheries Research, 31: 139-145.
  15. Gözler, A.M., Çiloğlu, E. 1998. A research on some population parameters of european anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus, 1758) caught in the Rize-Hopa coasts (in Turkish). Eastern Anatolia Ragion III. Fisheries Semp. 10-12 June 1998, Erzurum, Turkey, 373-383.
  16. Gücü, A.C. 2002. Can over fishing be responsible for the successful establishment of Minemiopsis leidyi in the Black Sea? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 54: 439-451.
  17. Gayanilo, Jr., Sparre C., Pauly P. 2005 FAO-ICLARM stock assessment tools (FiSAT II). Revised version. User’s manual. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available athttp://www.fao.org/docrep/ 009/y5997e/y5997e00.htm.
  18. Genç, Y., Zengin, M., Başar, S., Tabak, İ., Ceylan, B., Çiftçi, Y., Üstündağ, C., Akbulut. B., Şahin, T. 1999. Research Project on Economical Fishery Products. Proje No: TAGEM/IY/96/17/3/001, Sonuç Raporu, TKB Su Ürünleri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü, Trabzon, 157 pp. (in Turkish).
  19. Ivanov, L., Kolarov, P. 1979. Relation between the catchments of Pontic shad (Alosa kessleri pontica, Eichw) and solar activity. Societas internationalis limno-logiae – SIL, XIX, Jubiläumstagung donauforschung, pp. 389–396.
  20. Karaçam, H., Düzgüneş. E. 1990. Age, growth and meat yield of European Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus,1758) in the Black Sea. Fisheries Research, 9: 181-186.
  21. Kayalı, E. 1998. A research on bioecological properties of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) fises in the Eastern Black Sea Ecosystem. Msc. Thesis, K.T.U., Sci. Tech., 238 p. (in Turkish).
  22. Kolarov, P. 1958a. On the reasons for depletion of Pontic shad catchments on our territory. Ribno Stopanstvo,1: 6–8 (in Bulgarian).
  23. Kolarov, P. 1958b. On Pontic shad (Alosa kessleri pontica, Pisces) movements along Bulgarian Black Sea shore. Priroda, 1: 70–72(in Bulgarian).
  24. Kolarov P. 1960a. Status and prospects of Pontic shad catchments along Bulgarian shore. Priroda, 4: 54–58 (in Bulgarian).
  25. Kolarov, P. 1960b. Some biological observations on Pontic shad (Alosa kessleri pontica). SRIFFI, 2, pp. 13–34 (in Bulgarian).
  26. Kolarov, P. 1961. Regarding to the oncoming of the Pontic shad to the Bulgarian Black Sea shore. Ribno Stopanstvo, 6: 6–7 (in Bulgarian).
  27. Kolarov, P. 1963. Biological notes on Pontic shad caught along Bulgarian Danube River shore in 1962. Ribno Stopanstvo, 8 (in Bulgarian).
  28. Kolarov, P., 1964. Some features on age structure changes of Pontic shad (Alosa kessleri pontica). Reports of the Institute of Aquaculture and Fisheries 5: 93–116 (in Bulgarian).
  29. Kolarov, P. 1965. On the biological characteristics of Alosa kessleri pontica from the Bulgarian sector of Danube River. Reports of SIFO, 6: 87–87(in Bulgarian).
  30. Kolarov, P. 1978. Some changes in Alosa kessleri pontica Eichw population during the spawning migration. Digest Limnologia na Balgarskiya Sector na Reka Dunav“, pp. 238–340 (in Bulgarian).
  31. Kolarov, P. 1980. Particularities of Pontic shad (Alosa kessleri pontica Eichw.) in 1979 in Bulgarian aquatory. Fisheries, 27(4): 17–19(in Bulgarian).
  32. Kolarov, P. 1982. Dynamics of Pontic Shad (Alosa kessleri pontica Eichw.) Stocks. Reports of IFR, vol. XIX, Zemizdat, pp. 35–55 (in Bulgarian).
  33. Kolarov, P., 1983. Some basic parameters of the Pontic shad (Alosa kesleri pontica) population. Hydrobiologiya, 19:60–69 (in Bulgarian).
  34. Kolarov, P., 1985. Biological particularities and population dynamics of the anadromous fish species. Dissertation to obtain the „Doctor of Science „degree, 300 pp. (in Bulgarian).
  35. Kolarov, P. 1989. State and stocks of some Bulgarian Black sea anatropous fish species. Hydrobiologiya, 34:50–58 (in Bulgarian).
  36. Kıdeys, A. E., A.D. Gordina., Bingel, , Nierman, U. 1999. The effect of  the environmental conditions on the distribution of eggs and larvae of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L.) in the Black Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56 Suplement: 58-64.
  37. Kutaygil, N. 1967. Preliminary age analysis of Mullus barbatus and Merluccius merluccius L. in the Sea of Marmara and some pelagic fish of Turkey. Proc. Tech. Pap. Gentile. Fish. Counc. Medit. FAO 8: 361-383.
  38. Lee, M.A., Lee, K.T. 1996. The larval anchovy (Engraulis japonicus) fishery in relation to the environmental factors in coastal waters of Franglio, Taiwan. Fisheries Research, 26: 37-48.
  39. Mullon, C., Cury, P., Penven, P.2002. Evolutionary individual-based model the recruitment of anchovy (Engraulis capensis) in the Southern Benguela. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 59: 910-922.
  40. Mayorova, A.A., Tkacheva, K.S. 1959. Distribution and conditions of reproduction of pelamid (Sarda sarda) in the Black Sea according to data for the period 1956-1957. Proc. Tech. Pap. Gent. Fish. Counc. Medit. FAO 5:509-514.
  41. Mikhailov, K., Prodanov, K. 1983. Approximate assessment of the natural mortality rate of the anchovy in the Bulgarian Black Sea coast. Pross. IRR, Varna, 20: 173-182.
  42. Musick, J. A. 1999. Criteria to define extinction risk in marine fishes. The American Fisheries Society initiative. Fisheries, 24(12): 6–14.
  43. Özdamar, 1991. A research on estimation of some paameters of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L. 1758) stock in the Black Sea as viewpoint of population dynamics, Ph. D. Thesis, Ondokuz Mayis Universsity, Samsun, pp. 85.
  44. Özdamar, E., Khiara, K., Erkoyuncu, İ. 1991. Some biological characteristic of European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus in the Black Sea. Journal of the Tokyo University of Fisheries,(78)1: 57-64.
  45. Özdamar, E., Khiara., K. Sakuramato, K., Erkoyuncu, İ. 1994. Variation in the population structure of European Anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus In The Black Sea. Journal of the Tokyo University of Fisheries, (81)2: 123-134.
  46. Özdamar, E., Samsun O., Erkoyuncu, İ. 1995. The estimation of population parameters for anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) during 1994-1995 fishing seasons in the Turkish Black Sea region (in Turkish). Ege Uni. Fac of Fis., J. of Fis. and Aqua. Sci., 12(1-2), 135-144.
  47. Ozaydin, O., Bilecenoglu, M., Kaya, M. 2000. Age and growth of the Curled Picarel Centracanthus cirrus Rafinesque, 1810 (Osteichthyes: Centracanthidae) in Northern Cyprus, Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Acta Adriatica, 41(2), 35-42.
  48. Okgerman, H.C., Elp, M. Atasagun,  2010. The growth and reproduction of white bream (Blicca bjoerkna  L. 1758) in an oligo-mesotrophic lake in northwest Anatolia (Sapanca, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Biology, 36: 125-134.  doi: 10.3906/biy-1012-157.
  49. Prodanov, K., Mikhailov, K., Daskalov, G., Maxim, K., Chashchin, A., Arkhipov, A., Shlyakhov, V., Ozdamar, E. 1997. General fisheries council for the Mediterranean FAO. Environmental management of fish resources in the Black Sea and their rational exploitation. Studies and Reviews 68: 73-81.
  50. Pavlov, P. I.1953. Biological and commercial characteris-tics of the spawning schools of the Pontic shad. Tr. Inst. Hydrobiology AN USSR, vol. 28.
  51. Prodanov, K., Kolarov, P. 1983. On the question of the rational exploitation of the fish populations. Reports of IFR – Varna, 20:47–70 (in Bulgarian).
  52. Raykov, V., Yankova, M. 2005. Growth dynamics and mortality estimation of the Horse Mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus,Aleev) migrating along the Bulgarian Black SeaCoast,” in Proceedings of the 1st Biannual Scientific Conference Black Sea Ecosystemand Beyond, pp. 765–778, Istanbul, Turkey, May 2005.
  53. Raykova-Petrova, G., Zivkov, M. 1987. Biological meaning and practical use of the parameters from Bertalanffy equation in fish. Contemporary achievements of the Bulgarian zoology, Institute of Zoology - BAS, 105 (in Bulgarian).
  54. Rozdina, D. Raikova-Petrova G., Mirtcheva P. 2013. Age composition and growth rate of the spawning partof the population of pontic shad Alosa immaculata (Bennett, 1835) in the Bulgarian sector of Danube river. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19 (Supplement 1) 2013, 118–125.
  55. Rey, J.C., Alot, E. Ramos A. 1986. Growth of the Atlantic bonito (Sarda sarda Bloch, 1793) in the Atlantic and Mediterranean area of the Strait of Gibraltar. Inv. Pesq. 50 (2): 179-185.
  56. Şahin, T., Genc, Y., Okur, H. 1997.  Investigation of the growth and reproduction of horse mackerel (Trachurus  mediterraneus  ponticus Aleev) population in Turkish Black Sea coast. Turk. J. Zool. 21: 321-328 (in Turkish).
  57. Šantić, M., Jardas, I., Pallaoro A. 2002. Age, growth and mortality rates of horse mackerel, Trachurus trachurus (L.), living in the eastern central Adriatic. Period. biol. 104, 165-173.
  58. Samsun, O., Samsun., N., KaramollaoÄŸlu A. 2004. Age, growth and mortality rates of the European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus 1758) in the Turkish Black Sea Coast. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 28(5): 901-910.
  59. Samsun, O., Samsun N., Kalayci F., Bilgin S. 2006. A Study on Recent Variations in the Population Structure of European Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus, 1758) in the Southern Black Sea. Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences 2006, Volume 23, Issue (3-4): 301–306. ISSN 1300 - 1590
  60. Sparre, P., Venema, S. C. 1998. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper Nº 306.1. Rev. 2. Rome, FAO, 407 p. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W5449E/w5449e00.htm.
  61. Santamaria, N., Sion, L., Cacucci, M., Metrio, G. De. 1998. Età ed accrescimento di Sarda sarda (Bloch, 1793) (Pisces, Scombridae) nello Ionio Settentrionale. Biol. Mar. Medit. 5 (1): 721-725.
  62. Tkacheva, K.C. 1958. Conditions of pelamid stocks in the Black Sea and fishery prospectives. Rybn. Khoz. 34 (12): 10-13.
  63. Ünsal, N. 1989. A study on age-legth-weight relationship and determination of the smallest catching size of anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus (L., 1758)  in the Black Sea. Ist. Univ., J. of Aquatic Products. 3(1-2): 17-28. (in Turkish).
  64. Valeiras, X., Macías, D., Gómez, M.J., Lema, L., Alot, E., Ortiz de Urbina, J.M. and De la Serna, J.M. 2008. Age and growth of Atlantic bonito (Sarda sarda) in western Mediterranean Sea. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 62(5): 1649–1658.
  65. Yankova, M., Raykov, V. 2006. Approximate assessment of the horse mackerel natural mortality rate, Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Aleev in the Bulgarian Black Sea territorial waters. Secretary marine I.N.C.D.M. 36, 341-348.
  66. Yankova, M. Condition factor, sex ratio and length-weight relationship, of Horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) from the Bulgarian Black Sea coast. Proceedings of the Union of Scientists-Varna, Series “Technical Sciences” 2’2008/1’2009, 70-72.
  67. Yankova, M., Raykov, V. 2009. Resent investigation on population structure of Horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus , 1956) in the Bulgarian Black Sea coast,” Proceedings of the Institute of Fishing Resources Varna, vol. 27, pp. 39–46.
  68. Yankova,M., Mihneva V., Radu G., Mehanna S. 2010a. General biology of horse mackerel Trachurus mediterraneus (Aleev, 1956) off the Bulgarian Black Sea coast. Proceedings of the Union of Scientists – Varna Series “Marine Science” 2’2010, 73-77, ISSN 1310-5833, 73-77.
  69. Yankova, M., Raykov, V., Gerdzhikov, D., Bogomilova, P. 2010b. Growth and Length-Weight Relationships of the Horse Mackerel, Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus (Aleev, 1956), in the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Volume 34, Issue 1, 85-92.
  70. Yankova, M. 2010a. Some biological aspects of the horse mackerel catch of the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast. Cercetari marine - Recherches marines, 39, NIMRD, 239-249.
  71. Yankova, M. 2011. An overview on the distribution of horse mackerel Trachurus mediterraneus in the Black Sea. Proceedings of the Union of Scientists – Varna, Series “Marine Science”, 89-91pp., ISSN 1314-3379.
  72. Yankova, M., Pavlov, D.  Raykov V., Michneva V., Radu  2011.  Length-Weight Relationships of Ten Fish Species from the Bulgarian Black Sea waters. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 35 (2): 265 - 270.
  73. Yankova, M., 2013a. Population Dynamics of Horse Mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus) in the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast. ISRN Zoology, vol. 2013, Article ID 127287, 6 pages, doi:1155/2013/127287.
  74. Yankova, M., 2013b. A study on the growth of horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus Aleev, 1956) from Bulgarian waters of the Black Sea using length frequency analysis. J. Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment Vol. 19, No. 1: 111-120.
  75. Yankova, M. 2013c. An overview on the biology of horse mackerel, Trachurus mediterraneus, off the Bulgarian Black Sea coast. Animal Diversity, Natural History and Conservation, Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, (Edited by V. K.Gupta and Anil K. Verma), Vol.2., ISBN: 978-81-7035-831-2, 165-179.
  76. Yankova, M., Pavlov, D., Mihneva, V. 2013. Length-Weight Relationships of Еight Fish Species from the Bulgarian Black Sea waters. Animal Diversity, Natural History and Conservation, Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, (Edited by V. K.Gupta and Anil K. Verma), Vol.3., ISBN: 978-81-7035-830-5, 189-195.
  77. Zusser, S.G. 1954. Biology and fishery for bonito in the Black Sea. Tr. VNIRO 28:160-174.
  78. Zivkov, M., Trichkova, T., Raikova-Petrova, G. 1999 Biological reasons for unsuitability of growth parameters and indexes for comparing fish growth. Environmental Biology of Fishes 54: 67-76.
To cite this article

Maria YANKOVA , " Preliminary Estimates Of The Population Parameters Of Four Species In The Bulgarian Black Sea Coast ", International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology . Vol. 3, Issue 5, pp 46-52 , 2014


Responsive image

MNK Publication was founded in 2012 to upholder revolutionary ideas that would advance the research and practice of business and management. Today, we comply with to advance fresh thinking in latest scientific fields where we think we can make a real difference and growth now also including medical and social care, education,management and engineering.

Responsive image

We offers several opportunities for partnership and tie-up with individual, corporate and organizational level. We are working on the open access platform. Editors, authors, readers, librarians and conference organizer can work together. We are giving open opportunities to all. Our team is always willing to work and collaborate to promote open access publication.

Responsive image

Our Journals provide one of the strongest International open access platform for research communities. Our conference proceeding services provide conference organizers a privileged platform for publishing extended conference papers as journal publications. It is deliberated to disseminate scientific research and to establish long term International collaborations and partnerships with academic communities and conference organizers.